Triple

T3455191
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tonnerre E72887 entity
Predicate river P165 FINISHED
Object Armançon E287728 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Armançon | Statement: [Tonnerre, river, Armançon]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Armançon
Context triple: [Tonnerre, river, Armançon]
  • A. Armançon chosen
    Armançon is a river in central-eastern France that flows through the Burgundy region before joining the Yonne River.
  • B. Clessé
    Clessé is a wine-producing village in the Mâconnais region of Burgundy, France, known for its quality white wines.
  • C. Cugny
    Cugny is a locality within the municipality of Bernex in the canton of Geneva, Switzerland.
  • D. Pougny
    Pougny is a small French commune, likely located near the Swiss border in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region.
  • E. La Dôle
    La Dôle is a prominent mountain peak in the Jura range of western Switzerland, known for its panoramic views over Lake Geneva and the Alps and for hosting telecommunications and weather facilities near its summit.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85b12a908190a1d10a6b03b4f8ae completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adbaa5e2188190a8157cb8dcca8d30 completed March 8, 2026, 6:06 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b53fd1a2088190b43cded6c0e90633 completed March 14, 2026, 11 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:16 p.m.