Triple
T34526466
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Magistrates Court of Western Australia |
E886411
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasJudicialOfficers |
P55584
|
FINISHED |
| Object | magistrates |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: magistrates | Statement: [Magistrates Court of Western Australia, hasJudicialOfficers, magistrates]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasJudicialOfficers Context triple: [Magistrates Court of Western Australia, hasJudicialOfficers, magistrates]
-
A.
hasJudicialOfficer
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or served by a specific judicial officer (such as a judge or magistrate) responsible for legal or court-related functions.
-
B.
hasJudiciary
Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
-
C.
hasMagistrateJudges
Indicates that one legal jurisdiction, court, or governing body includes or is served by one or more magistrate judges.
-
D.
hasJudges
Indicates that one entity serves as a judge or panel of judges for another entity, such as an event, competition, or legal case.
-
E.
hasJudge
Indicates that a legal case, proceeding, or decision is presided over or decided by a particular judge.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349cd7c148190aa99192b126d1527 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7234bcaa48190ac970759d34e254a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72155c48881909bd40b9aa3febd5a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:02 a.m.