Triple

T34500249
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mrs. Errol E885729 entity
Predicate laterRelationshipWithEarlOfDorincourt P143393 FINISHED
Object mutual respect LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mutual respect | Statement: [Mrs. Errol, laterRelationshipWithEarlOfDorincourt, mutual respect]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterRelationshipWithEarlOfDorincourt
Context triple: [Mrs. Errol, laterRelationshipWithEarlOfDorincourt, mutual respect]
  • A. relationshipToEarlJr
    Indicates the specific familial or social relationship that an entity has to Earl Jr.
  • B. titleHolderRelationshipToEarl
    Indicates the familial or social relationship that the current title holder has to the Earl.
  • C. laterPeerageConnections chosen
    Indicates that one entity acquires or forms peerage-related ties (such as titles, ranks, or noble associations) at a later time or stage in relation to another entity.
  • D. successorAsEarlOfHuntingdon
    Indicates that one person became the next Earl of Huntingdon following another person in that title or office.
  • E. successorAsEarlOfMorton
    Indicates the person who became the next Earl of Morton after the previous holder of the title.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349cc0220819081f154c6964f4dc2 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a002ae74da08190a4b47e0ff0f7f8fe completed May 10, 2026, 6:51 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0029cc369c81909578e52c4a75ab18 completed May 10, 2026, 6:46 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:01 a.m.