Triple

T34436636
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Brian Walker E883974 entity
Predicate hasCoStarInWork P197084 FINISHED
Object Diana Ross E51575 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Diana Ross | Statement: [Brian Walker, hasCoStarInWork, Diana Ross]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCoStarInWork
Context triple: [Brian Walker, hasCoStarInWork, Diana Ross]
  • A. hasCoStarHumanCharacter chosen
    Indicates that a human character appears as a co-star alongside another character in the same work or production.
  • B. hasPartnerInWork
    Indicates that one entity collaborates professionally or is partnered with another entity in a work-related context.
  • C. hasWorksIn
    Indicates that one entity is employed by or performs their professional activities within the organization, location, or context represented by another entity.
  • D. hasWorkUsedFor
    Indicates that a particular work (e.g., document, resource, or artifact) is utilized for a specific purpose, task, or activity.
  • E. hasCollaborationIn
    Indicates that two or more entities work together or jointly participate in a specific project, context, or domain.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349c548d88190978e2a82502c03d0 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8ae0248190b7e2ce4bf852c22d completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a3718362d2c8190a4c4ad11a0df0cdb completed June 20, 2026, 10:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379fbe4a08190bfe65ebd141164e9 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2 a.m.