Triple
T34376576
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | El Roi |
E882300
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGenderInLanguage |
P3087
|
FINISHED |
| Object | masculine (in Hebrew grammar) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: masculine (in Hebrew grammar) | Statement: [El Roi, hasGenderInLanguage, masculine (in Hebrew grammar)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGenderInLanguage Context triple: [El Roi, hasGenderInLanguage, masculine (in Hebrew grammar)]
-
A.
hasGrammaticalGender
chosen
Indicates that one entity assigns or possesses a specific grammatical gender in relation to another entity (such as a word, phrase, or linguistic unit).
-
B.
hasGenderDistinction
Indicates that a relationship, classification, or linguistic form differentiates entities based on gender categories.
-
C.
hasGenderInPortuguese
Indicates that a term or entity is associated with a specific grammatical gender in the Portuguese language.
-
D.
hasGenderInText
Indicates that a specified gender is explicitly mentioned or assigned to an entity within a given text.
-
E.
hasGenderVariant
Indicates that one entity is a gender-specific form or variant of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349bf5d7481908dd5da4cbdf74047 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd67191cf88190b53ecbf5be3564e9 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd654fdaac81908e67e75194710f06 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:23 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:59 a.m.