Triple
T34334547
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stabat mater dolorosa |
E881108
|
entity |
| Predicate | restoredToLiturgyInYear |
P179120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1727 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1727 | Statement: [Stabat mater dolorosa, restoredToLiturgyInYear, 1727]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: restoredToLiturgyInYear Context triple: [Stabat mater dolorosa, restoredToLiturgyInYear, 1727]
-
A.
restoredLiturgicalHeritageIn
Indicates that an entity has brought back, preserved, or revitalized the liturgical heritage or traditions within a particular place or context.
-
B.
usedInLiturgy
Indicates that something is employed or incorporated as part of a formal religious liturgy or worship service.
-
C.
canonizedDuring
Indicates that an individual was officially declared a saint during a specified time period or under a particular authority.
-
D.
yearOfReceptionIntoCatholicChurch
Indicates the calendar year in which an entity was formally received into the Catholic Church.
-
E.
liturgicalReform
Indicates changes made to established religious worship practices, rites, or ceremonies, typically to update, standardize, or adapt them.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349ba96a08190b94887bae2d8ee49 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71c35327c8190884f1bfe12bd2cd7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71822d0e88190ac9731c7ae5a4def |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:40 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f71c33edac8190a59f6ff19b265fc5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:58 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:58 a.m.