Triple

T34328024
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Part 61 E880923 entity
Predicate hasTrainingStructure P200009 FINISHED
Object flexible training structure LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: flexible training structure | Statement: [Part 61, hasTrainingStructure, flexible training structure]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTrainingStructure
Context triple: [Part 61, hasTrainingStructure, flexible training structure]
  • A. hasTrainingFor
    Indicates that an entity has received or possesses training that prepares it for performing a specific task, role, or function.
  • B. hasTrainingTrack
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or assigned to a specific training track or program.
  • C. hasTrainingType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a specific type or category of training.
  • D. hasCoachingStructure
    Indicates that one entity provides an organized coaching framework, system, or arrangement for another entity.
  • E. hasTrainingComplex
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a dedicated facility or complex used for training activities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349ba96a08190b94887bae2d8ee49 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff6a4ce9a08190b98abde3a170dd69 completed May 9, 2026, 5:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff69c11634819089d1084bd2c11534 completed May 9, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff6a4c32dc819097f591944bee8851 completed May 9, 2026, 5:09 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:58 a.m.