Triple

T342890
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject US–UK Bilateral Working Groups E6874 entity
Predicate relationshipManaged P12071 FINISHED
Object US–UK diplomatic relationship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: US–UK diplomatic relationship | Statement: [US–UK Bilateral Working Groups, relationshipManaged, US–UK diplomatic relationship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipManaged
Context triple: [US–UK Bilateral Working Groups, relationshipManaged, US–UK diplomatic relationship]
  • A. associatedWithManager
    Indicates that an entity has a managerial connection or relationship with a specific manager.
  • B. relationshipToHumans
    Indicates the nature or type of connection, association, or relevance that something has specifically with humans.
  • C. historicalRelationship
    Indicates a relationship that existed between entities in the past, often tied to a specific historical period, context, or event.
  • D. hasFamilialTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected by family bonds, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
  • E. spouseOrLover
    Indicates a romantic partnership between two entities, whether formalized as a spouse or existing as a lover.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7951ba08190960e90823b5078f3 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eafef8c88190a5932eb2c6ac4a5d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e9530c98819085025efe4e04aa7e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea0a4c448190a8a179daa9b90645 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.