Triple
T34280729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New York |
E879581
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesCourtOfAppealsAsCourtOfLastResort |
P52844
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [New York, usesCourtOfAppealsAsCourtOfLastResort, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesCourtOfAppealsAsCourtOfLastResort Context triple: [New York, usesCourtOfAppealsAsCourtOfLastResort, true]
-
A.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
-
B.
hasNumberOfCourtsOfLastResort
Indicates the quantity of highest-level judicial courts (courts of last resort) that an entity possesses or is associated with.
-
C.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
-
D.
previousHighestCourtOfAppeal
Indicates that one court previously served as the highest court of appeal for another jurisdiction or legal system.
-
E.
hearsAppealsIn
Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b5f6648190b9420d94a4cd16e0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd884cb2b48190b6acd473430d9e19 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd8709ca208190a8bab836f0156af5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:47 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:57 a.m.