Triple

T3421731
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gomarists E72128 entity
Predicate positionAtSynodOfDort P48618 FINISHED
Object dominant party LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dominant party | Statement: [Gomarists, positionAtSynodOfDort, dominant party]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionAtSynodOfDort
Context triple: [Gomarists, positionAtSynodOfDort, dominant party]
  • A. hasSynod
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, governed by, or participates in a particular synod (a formal ecclesiastical council or assembly).
  • B. positionInChurch
    Indicates that one entity holds a specific role, office, or rank within a church organization or hierarchy.
  • C. relatedSynod
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is associated with, connected to, or involved in the same synod (a formal ecclesiastical council or assembly) as another entity.
  • D. postSynodal
    Indicates a relationship or action that occurs after, or as a consequence of, a synod or synodal decision.
  • E. positionInMagisterium
    Indicates that one entity holds a specific office, rank, or role within the magisterial teaching authority structure of another entity (typically a church or religious institution).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85ad38e48190b7660c5118a35289 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb950f65481908c4aad15516e7a7c completed March 8, 2026, 6 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adadfea024819094b41a13bc004bda completed March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb00f4f8c81908f88daf71f6a9c29 completed March 8, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:15 p.m.