Triple

T34188403
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Koderma district E877025 entity
Predicate literacyCharacteristic P111042 FINISHED
Object developing literacy rate LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: developing literacy rate | Statement: [Koderma district, literacyCharacteristic, developing literacy rate]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: literacyCharacteristic
Context triple: [Koderma district, literacyCharacteristic, developing literacy rate]
  • A. typeOfLiteracy
    Indicates the specific kind or category of literacy (e.g., digital, financial, media) that characterizes an entity’s literacy skills or practices.
  • B. literacyStatus
    Indicates whether an entity possesses the ability to read and write, or its level of literacy.
  • C. literaryFeature
    Indicates a relationship where something possesses or exhibits a characteristic, device, or stylistic element used in literature.
  • D. bookCharacteristic
    Indicates that a particular characteristic, feature, or attribute is associated with a given book.
  • E. hasLiteracyConcern chosen
    Indicates that an entity has an identified issue, risk, or challenge related to literacy skills or abilities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349af20a4819089ac24d28f2d8112 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7cec454a88190a9f3bbee2b856636 completed May 3, 2026, 10:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c8977c288190997a892ec5f756ed completed May 3, 2026, 10:13 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:55 a.m.