Triple
T34067821
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jordi Turull |
E873675
|
entity |
| Predicate | facedLegalProceedingsIn |
P3010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Spain |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spain | Statement: [Jordi Turull, facedLegalProceedingsIn, Spain]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: facedLegalProceedingsIn Context triple: [Jordi Turull, facedLegalProceedingsIn, Spain]
-
A.
hasLegalProceeding
chosen
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
B.
hasOngoingLegalSignificance
Indicates that a legal matter, status, or decision continues to have current relevance, effect, or consequences under the law.
-
C.
hasCriminalProcedureBasedOn
Indicates that one legal system’s criminal procedure is derived from, modeled on, or fundamentally influenced by another specified source or framework.
-
D.
representedInCourtBy
Indicates that one party serves as the legal representative or attorney for another party in a court proceeding.
-
E.
legalStatusOfProceedings
Indicates the current legal standing or condition of a set of legal proceedings within a judicial or administrative process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349a4af208190afa14888f9c9fb9d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70fb4f18c819099ef6d9177b7d205 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70f3a54d481909ba6bdda3647b761 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.