Triple
T34045388
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tribunales Colegiados de Circuito |
E873072
|
entity |
| Predicate | resuelven |
P9755
|
FINISHED |
| Object | amparo directo |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: amparo directo | Statement: [Tribunales Colegiados de Circuito, resuelven, amparo directo]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resuelven Context triple: [Tribunales Colegiados de Circuito, resuelven, amparo directo]
-
A.
resolves
chosen
Indicates that one entity successfully finds a solution, answer, or outcome for a problem, conflict, or uncertainty involving another entity.
-
B.
resolutionIdea
Indicates a proposed method, plan, or approach intended to resolve or address a particular issue, conflict, or problem.
-
C.
resolvedIn
Indicates that an issue, conflict, or process is brought to a conclusion or solution within a specified context, medium, or timeframe.
-
D.
resolution
Indicates the act of formally deciding, settling, or expressing a determined stance on an issue, often through an official decision or statement.
-
E.
solved
Indicates that one entity has successfully found a solution or answer to a problem, task, or challenge involving another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349a3363081909cea4c9a848cefe2 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70fb4f18c819099ef6d9177b7d205 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70f3a54d481909ba6bdda3647b761 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:51 a.m.