Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Pragmatic Sanction of 1713 | Statement: [Second Silesian War, legalFrameworkContext, Pragmatic Sanction of 1713]

Target entity: Pragmatic Sanction of 1713
Context triple: [Second Silesian War, legalFrameworkContext, Pragmatic Sanction of 1713]

• A. Pragmatic Sanction of 1713 (context for Habsburg succession) chosen
  The Pragmatic Sanction of 1713 was an edict issued by Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI to ensure the indivisibility of the Habsburg lands and allow his daughter Maria Theresa to inherit them, reshaping the dynastic succession in Central Europe.
• B. Pragmatic Sanction of 1549
  The Pragmatic Sanction of 1549 was an imperial decree by Charles V that unified his scattered Burgundian and Habsburg territories in the Low Countries into a single, hereditary political entity.
• C. Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges
  The Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges was a 1438 decree by King Charles VII of France that asserted the French crown’s control over the national church and limited papal authority, laying groundwork for Gallicanism.
• D. Pragmatic Sanction of 1830
  The Pragmatic Sanction of 1830 was a decree by King Ferdinand VII of Spain that allowed his daughter Isabella to inherit the throne, overturning Salic law and helping trigger the Carlist Wars over the succession.
• E. Treaty of Lisbon (1668)
  The Treaty of Lisbon (1668) was the peace agreement by which Spain formally recognized Portugal’s independence, ending the Portuguese Restoration War and reestablishing stable relations between the two kingdoms.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: legalFrameworkContext
Context triple: [Second Silesian War, legalFrameworkContext, Pragmatic Sanction of 1713]

• A. legalContext chosen
  Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
• B. includesLegalFramework
  Indicates that one entity encompasses, references, or incorporates a specific legal framework within its scope or content.
• C. legalDoctrine
  Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
• D. legalBackground
  Indicates that an entity has education, training, or experience related to law or the legal profession.
• E. legalScope
  Indicates the range, boundaries, or extent of authority, applicability, or effect that something has under a particular legal framework or rule.
• F. None of above.