Triple

T33994183
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Miguel and J. Cole E871628 entity
Predicate lyricalStyleDescription P9652 FINISHED
Object introspective lyricism LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: introspective lyricism | Statement: [Miguel and J. Cole, lyricalStyleDescription, introspective lyricism]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lyricalStyleDescription
Context triple: [Miguel and J. Cole, lyricalStyleDescription, introspective lyricism]
  • A. lyricalLanguage
    Indicates that something is expressed using poetic, figurative, or highly expressive language.
  • B. lyricalPerspective
    Indicates the narrative or point of view from which lyrics are expressed in a song or vocal piece.
  • C. hasLyricalStyle chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical style in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. songwriterStyle
    Indicates that one entity creates songs in the characteristic manner, genre, or stylistic approach associated with another entity.
  • E. lyricalFunction
    Indicates the role or purpose that lyrics serve within a musical or poetic work, such as narrating, expressing emotion, or structuring the piece.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3499f8cbc81908de6ec89fa91ea8f completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f703c9eadc8190b1b008c843cb0c84 completed May 3, 2026, 8:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f70101ba1c819099380274e6df9a4d completed May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:50 a.m.