Triple
T33953394
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zürich |
E870500
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadLeadingReformer |
P48432
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Huldrych Zwingli |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Huldrych Zwingli | Statement: [Zürich, hadLeadingReformer, Huldrych Zwingli]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadLeadingReformer Context triple: [Zürich, hadLeadingReformer, Huldrych Zwingli]
-
A.
reformerOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the person or agent who initiated or carried out significant reforms or changes to another entity.
-
B.
notableReformerOpposition
Indicates that a notable reformer actively opposed, resisted, or campaigned against the referenced person, group, policy, or institution.
-
C.
advocatedReformOf
Indicates that one entity publicly supported or promoted changes to another entity, typically aiming to improve or modify its structure, policies, or practices.
-
D.
demandedReformFrom
Indicates that one party insisted that another party implement or agree to specific changes or reforms.
-
E.
previouslyReformedBy
Indicates that an entity was restructured, reorganized, or reformed by another entity at some earlier time in the past.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3499c2d7481909c953a5010227725 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7064e906881909c3186c646145d34 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70100ec1c8190a6b97f50e88891f2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:49 a.m.