Triple

T3392965
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article X – Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs E71461 entity
Predicate includes P1393 FINISHED
Object Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 E13641 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 | Statement: [Article X – Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs, includes, Federal Rule of Evidence 1002]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Federal Rule of Evidence 1002
Context triple: [Article X – Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs, includes, Federal Rule of Evidence 1002]
  • A. rules of evidence for the federal courts chosen
    The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
  • B. Fed. R. Evid. art. V
    Fed. R. Evid. art. V is the portion of the Federal Rules of Evidence that sets out the rules governing evidentiary privileges in federal court proceedings.
  • C. Rule 610
    Rule 610 is a provision in the rules of evidence that governs the admissibility of a witness’s religious beliefs or opinions, generally prohibiting their use to attack or support the witness’s credibility.
  • D. Illinois Rules of Evidence
    The Illinois Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards that govern what evidence is admissible and how it may be presented in Illinois state court proceedings.
  • E. Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence
    The Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards that regulate what evidence is admissible and how it may be presented in Pennsylvania courts.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a9c4a88190a854019341cb3b60 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb851e57c8190983cadcedc58db50 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b35464d9a88190aec3a7597cecff21 completed March 13, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.