Triple
T3392887
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article VIII – Hearsay |
E71459
|
entity |
| Predicate | generalRuleLocatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rule 802 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rule 802 | Statement: [Article VIII – Hearsay, generalRuleLocatedIn, Rule 802]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: generalRuleLocatedIn Context triple: [Article VIII – Hearsay, generalRuleLocatedIn, Rule 802]
-
A.
locatedIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity exists or is situated within the spatial, administrative, or conceptual boundaries of another entity.
-
B.
locatedUnder
Indicates that one entity is positioned directly or generally beneath another entity in space.
-
C.
locatedAlong
Indicates that one entity is situated adjacent to, or running beside, the length or course of another linear feature (such as a road, river, or railway).
-
D.
possibleLocation
Indicates that an entity may be located at, or could plausibly occur in, a specified place or spatial context.
-
E.
subjectLocation
Indicates that one entity is located at, in, or near the place or position specified by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a9c4a88190a854019341cb3b60 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb851e57c8190983cadcedc58db50 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adadf705608190975423779430cc58 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.