Triple

T3392876
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article VIII – Hearsay E71459 entity
Predicate containsRule P2846 FINISHED
Object Federal Rule of Evidence 801 E71459 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rule of Evidence 801 | Statement: [Article VIII – Hearsay, containsRule, Federal Rule of Evidence 801]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Federal Rule of Evidence 801
Context triple: [Article VIII – Hearsay, containsRule, Federal Rule of Evidence 801]
  • A. rules of evidence for the federal courts
    The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
  • B. Louisiana Code of Evidence
    The Louisiana Code of Evidence is the statutory framework that governs what evidence is admissible and how it is presented in legal proceedings within the state of Louisiana.
  • C. Illinois Rules of Evidence
    The Illinois Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards that govern what evidence is admissible and how it may be presented in Illinois state court proceedings.
  • D. Article VIII – Hearsay chosen
    Article VIII – Hearsay is the section of the Federal Rules of Evidence that defines hearsay and sets out the rules governing when out-of-court statements may be admitted in federal court proceedings.
  • E. Rule 56
    Rule 56 is the provision in the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that governs summary judgment, allowing courts to decide cases without trial when there is no genuine dispute of material fact.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a9c4a88190a854019341cb3b60 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb851e57c8190983cadcedc58db50 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b34bc62c788190b6097e02601df386 completed March 12, 2026, 11:27 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.