Triple

T3392678
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article III – Presumptions in Civil Cases E71455 entity
Predicate distinguishedFrom P1612 FINISHED
Object Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits E71456 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits | Statement: [Article III – Presumptions in Civil Cases, distinguishedFrom, Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits
Context triple: [Article III – Presumptions in Civil Cases, distinguishedFrom, Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits]
  • A. Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits chosen
    Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits is a section of the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that defines when evidence is considered relevant and sets boundaries on its admissibility in court.
  • B. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
    A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law is a book in which Justice Antonin Scalia articulates and defends his textualist approach to statutory and constitutional interpretation in the American legal system.
  • C. The Uses of Argument
    The Uses of Argument is a foundational work in informal logic and argumentation theory in which Stephen Toulmin introduces his influential model for analyzing practical reasoning.
  • D. The Paradoxes of Legal Science
    The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
  • E. On Interpretation
    On Interpretation is a foundational philosophical treatise by Aristotle that examines language, meaning, and the logical structure of propositions, laying groundwork for later logic and semantics.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a9c4a88190a854019341cb3b60 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb851e57c8190983cadcedc58db50 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b34bc62c788190b6097e02601df386 completed March 12, 2026, 11:27 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.