Triple

T3392621
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article II – Judicial Notice E71454 entity
Predicate partOf P40 FINISHED
Object Federal Rules of Evidence E13641 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rules of Evidence | Statement: [Article II – Judicial Notice, partOf, Federal Rules of Evidence]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Federal Rules of Evidence
Context triple: [Article II – Judicial Notice, partOf, Federal Rules of Evidence]
  • A. rules of evidence for the federal courts chosen
    The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
  • B. Federal Rule of Evidence 1006
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
  • C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
    Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
  • E. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a9c4a88190a854019341cb3b60 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb851e57c8190983cadcedc58db50 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b37e5353ec819089d2736493936c46 completed March 13, 2026, 3:02 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.