Triple
T33925670
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gora universe |
E869743
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingPowerInSetting |
P180154
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British Empire |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British Empire | Statement: [Gora universe, governingPowerInSetting, British Empire]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governingPowerInSetting Context triple: [Gora universe, governingPowerInSetting, British Empire]
-
A.
settingOfAuthority
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the context, domain, or environment within which another entity holds or exercises authority.
-
B.
areGovernedBy
Indicates that one or more entities are under the authority, control, or administration of a governing body or ruler.
-
C.
governingPowerRelationship
Indicates a relationship where one entity holds authoritative control, influence, or ruling power over another entity.
-
D.
governsInPoliticalSystem
Indicates that one entity exercises authoritative control or rule over another entity within a specified political system or structure.
-
E.
overallPoliticalAuthority
Indicates that one entity holds ultimate governing power or supreme decision-making control over the political actions and policies of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349992c508190aa4afa24a086cc8c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00bf5990e08190a8b633e237656564 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00beef4f5881909b00ac89e6af5902 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:49 a.m.