Triple

T3392322
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rules Enabling Act E71447 entity
Predicate basisFor P125 FINISHED
Object Federal Rules of Evidence E13641 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rules of Evidence | Statement: [Rules Enabling Act, basisFor, Federal Rules of Evidence]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Rules of Evidence
Context triple: [Rules Enabling Act, basisFor, Federal Rules of Evidence]
  • A. rules of evidence for the federal courts chosen
    The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
  • B. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
    Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
  • C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 806
    Federal Rule of Evidence 806 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that governs how and when a hearsay declarant’s credibility may be attacked or supported as if the declarant had testified in court.
  • E. Illinois Rules of Evidence
    The Illinois Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards that govern what evidence is admissible and how it may be presented in Illinois state court proceedings.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a9c4a88190a854019341cb3b60 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb851e57c8190983cadcedc58db50 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b367f0913c8190b0c45174011bec3b completed March 13, 2026, 1:27 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.