Triple
T3388751
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Klaaswaal |
E71365
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWaterManagement |
P46549
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dikes and polders |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dikes and polders | Statement: [Klaaswaal, hasWaterManagement, dikes and polders]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWaterManagement Context triple: [Klaaswaal, hasWaterManagement, dikes and polders]
-
A.
hasWaterManagementIssue
Indicates that an entity experiences problems or challenges related to the control, distribution, quality, or availability of water.
-
B.
managesWaterFrom
Indicates that one entity is responsible for controlling, directing, or handling water originating from another entity.
-
C.
waterManagementArea
chosen
Indicates the designated region or zone over which specific water resources are managed, regulated, or administered.
-
D.
waterManagementAuthority
Indicates that an entity has official responsibility for overseeing, regulating, or managing water resources, services, or infrastructure for a given area or system.
-
E.
hasWaterRightsSystem
Indicates that an entity possesses or is governed by a defined system regulating legal rights to use water resources.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a8fd9c819095ecedf838d2bf1b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb665c6008190b33994ef20f5bd61 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada43615f08190ac2275020d157983 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.