Triple
T3387063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Andries de Witt |
E71326
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | de Witt |
E50699
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: de Witt | Statement: [Andries de Witt, familyName, de Witt]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: de Witt Context triple: [Andries de Witt, familyName, de Witt]
-
A.
De Witt
chosen
De Witt is a Dutch surname most famously associated with Johan de Witt, a prominent 17th-century statesman of the Dutch Republic.
-
B.
Anna de Witt
Anna de Witt was a member of the prominent Dutch De Witt family of the 17th century, known primarily as a daughter of the influential statesman Johan de Witt.
-
C.
De La Motte
De La Motte is a French-origin surname historically associated with various notable figures, including early 20th-century American silent film actress Marguerite De La Motte.
-
D.
Willem Carbentus
Willem Carbentus was a Dutch bookbinder and printer best known as the maternal grandfather of the painter Vincent van Gogh.
-
E.
Surratt
Surratt is a surname most notably associated with Mary Surratt, who was convicted as a conspirator in the assassination of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a8fd9c819095ecedf838d2bf1b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb66448fc8190a8582145f02bb1d9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b33458130881908a2b47abd91f4ea8 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.