Triple

T33869751
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CanvasPattern E868166 entity
Predicate methodBelongsTo P178667 FINISHED
Object CanvasPattern.setTransform NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CanvasPattern.setTransform | Statement: [CanvasPattern, methodBelongsTo, CanvasPattern.setTransform]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: methodBelongsTo
Context triple: [CanvasPattern, methodBelongsTo, CanvasPattern.setTransform]
  • A. belongTo
    Indicates that one entity is a member, part, or property of another entity, signifying ownership, inclusion, or association.
  • B. belongsToModule
    Indicates that something is a component or part of a specific module within a larger system or structure.
  • C. findsBelongingWith
    Indicates that one entity experiences a sense of acceptance, comfort, or fitting in when associated with another entity.
  • D. canBelongTo
    Indicates that something is capable of being a member or part of a particular group, category, or owner.
  • E. believedToBelongTo
    Indicates that something is thought or assumed, but not definitively known, to be owned by or part of a particular entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34995029081909ede0f7df73d1a5e completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f713bfdc148190a249a7874320bab8 completed May 3, 2026, 9:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7127884388190884f23d181a65d19 completed May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7135fa2988190a20a94cfe616d754 completed May 3, 2026, 9:20 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:47 a.m.