Triple
T33867818
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joule’s law of heating |
E868104
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPowerForm |
P194201
|
FINISHED |
| Object | P = I^2 R |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: P = I^2 R | Statement: [Joule’s law of heating, hasPowerForm, P = I^2 R]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPowerForm Context triple: [Joule’s law of heating, hasPowerForm, P = I^2 R]
-
A.
hasPower
Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
-
B.
hasAlternativePowerForm
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as an alternative representation or formulation of the power-related form of another entity.
-
C.
hasAssociatedPower
Indicates that one entity possesses, is linked to, or is characterized by a particular power or capability.
-
D.
hadPowerType
Indicates that an entity possessed or was associated with a specific type or category of power.
-
E.
hasPowerful
Indicates that one entity possesses significant strength, influence, or capability relative to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34995029081909ede0f7df73d1a5e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff0b6bc4a88190bf1d38c6ea26bcdc |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff082a22f4819095ded971dbd8ea7b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:10 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:47 a.m.