Triple
T338567
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dropbear SSH |
E6782
|
entity |
| Predicate | implementsFeature |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | public key authentication |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: public key authentication | Statement: [Dropbear SSH, implementsFeature, public key authentication]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: implementsFeature Context triple: [Dropbear SSH, implementsFeature, public key authentication]
-
A.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
B.
hasFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
-
C.
featuresSupporter
Indicates that one entity serves as a supporter, advocate, or promoter of another entity or its cause.
-
D.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
-
E.
canBeImplementedWith
Indicates that one entity is capable of being realized, executed, or fulfilled through the use or application of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79434908190a9d5afe415153ad9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eae3a27c81909fc7deb600125fb1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e95067e88190a914a1c1d0283dfc |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.