Triple

T33853376
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sally E867695 entity
Predicate entangledAfterEvent P91259 FINISHED
Object mysterious car accident LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mysterious car accident | Statement: [Sally, entangledAfterEvent, mysterious car accident]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: entangledAfterEvent
Context triple: [Sally, entangledAfterEvent, mysterious car accident]
  • A. entangledWith
    Indicates a mutual state in which two or more entities are so interconnected that a change or condition in one inherently affects or constrains the other(s).
  • B. closedAfterEvent
    Indicates that an entity becomes or is marked as closed following the occurrence of a specified event.
  • C. canBeEntangledIn chosen
    Indicates that one entity is capable of becoming physically or conceptually caught, intertwined, or ensnared within another entity or situation.
  • D. laterRelatedEvent
    Indicates that one event is temporally related to another by occurring at a later time.
  • E. dissolvedAfterEvent
    Indicates that an entity ceased to exist, function, or remain intact as a direct consequence of a specified event occurring beforehand.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349937b648190a34ada70f6a2b534 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f70075a0888190b3470cf7e5aaf482 completed May 3, 2026, 7:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6fc59518081908b0275f47721d561 completed May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:47 a.m.