Triple
T33849302
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A Portrait of Merle Haggard |
E867570
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsWorkingClassAnthems |
P202055
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [A Portrait of Merle Haggard, containsWorkingClassAnthems, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsWorkingClassAnthems Context triple: [A Portrait of Merle Haggard, containsWorkingClassAnthems, true]
-
A.
isPartyAnthem
Indicates that a song is widely recognized or intended as an energetic, celebratory track commonly played at parties.
-
B.
isConsideredRockAnthem
Indicates that a song is widely regarded or recognized as a rock anthem, typically emblematic or iconic within the rock music genre.
-
C.
hasChoralArrangementsBy
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work) has choral arrangements created or adapted by the specified entity.
-
D.
isDefiningAnthemOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the official or primary anthem that represents or symbolizes another entity.
-
E.
hasDistinctAnthemFor
Indicates that one entity has a unique, separate anthem specifically designated for the other entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349937b648190a34ada70f6a2b534 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a004a8892c08190bcacb952ad737716 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 9:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a004a44b4948190be4b3dbfce8da020 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 9:05 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a004a87bb908190a2bd164a60245f1d |
completed | May 10, 2026, 9:06 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:47 a.m.