Triple
T338476
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 4252 |
E6780
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletes |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 4250 |
E46361
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 4250 | Statement: [RFC 4252, obsoletes, RFC 4250]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 4250 Context triple: [RFC 4252, obsoletes, RFC 4250]
-
A.
RFC 4250
chosen
RFC 4250 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that defines and registers protocol parameters and message numbers used by the Secure Shell (SSH) protocol suite.
-
B.
RFC 4254
RFC 4254 is the Internet standard that specifies the Secure Shell (SSH) connection protocol, defining how multiple logical channels are multiplexed over a single encrypted SSH transport.
-
C.
RFC 4252
RFC 4252 is an Internet standard that specifies the authentication protocol used by Secure Shell (SSH) for secure remote login and other network services.
-
D.
RFC 2419
RFC 2419 is an earlier Internet standard related to secure shell (SSH) protocols that was later superseded by RFC 4253.
-
E.
RFC 3546
RFC 3546 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) specification that originally defined the use of extensions within the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79434908190a9d5afe415153ad9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eae3a27c81909fc7deb600125fb1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a4176f80488190bbee9a442a6a7076 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:39 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.