Triple
T33843296
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Meriam people |
E867410
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDoctrineConfirmed |
P199508
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rejection of terra nullius in Australia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rejection of terra nullius in Australia | Statement: [Meriam people, legalDoctrineConfirmed, rejection of terra nullius in Australia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDoctrineConfirmed Context triple: [Meriam people, legalDoctrineConfirmed, rejection of terra nullius in Australia]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
C.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
D.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
E.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349937b648190a34ada70f6a2b534 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff3fb2318c81908a46c2f513608935 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff3e96dcc48190819f6204680d84aa |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff3fb151008190bf8a90f9f1c5f0c8 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:47 a.m.