Triple
T3382894
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anthropology of Work Review |
E71227
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMethodologicalFocus |
P28210
|
FINISHED |
| Object | anthropological approaches |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: anthropological approaches | Statement: [Anthropology of Work Review, hasMethodologicalFocus, anthropological approaches]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMethodologicalFocus Context triple: [Anthropology of Work Review, hasMethodologicalFocus, anthropological approaches]
-
A.
methodologyType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of method or procedure used in carrying out an activity or study.
-
B.
methodologicalStatus
Indicates the methodological role or classification that one entity assigns to another within a research or analytical framework.
-
C.
disciplinaryMethod
Indicates a method or approach used to discipline, correct, or control another party’s behavior.
-
D.
hasMethodologyDocument
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or supported by, a specific methodology document that defines its procedures or approach.
-
E.
philosophicalMethod
Indicates the method, approach, or technique used in conducting philosophical inquiry or reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a8fd9c819095ecedf838d2bf1b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb5eb0d188190a94415498ba81c11 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada434bae48190a77ea37f9274ad8f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.