Triple

T33779141
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Language in the Americas E865603 entity
Predicate inAcademicDebateSince P177684 FINISHED
Object late 1980s LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: late 1980s | Statement: [Language in the Americas, inAcademicDebateSince, late 1980s]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inAcademicDebateSince
Context triple: [Language in the Americas, inAcademicDebateSince, late 1980s]
  • A. inAcademicDebate
    Indicates that one entity is engaged in a formal, scholarly argument or discussion with another entity, typically following academic norms and methods of reasoning.
  • B. debatedBetween
    Indicates a situation in which two or more parties engage in a discussion or argument over differing views about a particular issue or topic.
  • C. debatedWithin
    Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
  • D. majorDebateWith
    Indicates a significant, often public or formal, debate or dispute occurring between two entities.
  • E. hasDebateAround
    Indicates that there is ongoing discussion, disagreement, or controversy surrounding the referenced entity or topic.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498df6f88190bf9647ea4e4a956e completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7009d39508190af7301f824615e88 completed May 3, 2026, 8 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6fc5740fc81909774a4f65201a3ff completed May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6ffb7554881908993d6d2ffbcf8f5 completed May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:45 a.m.