Triple

T3375507
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New England Highway E71057 entity
Predicate followsRouteNumber P1864 FINISHED
Object A15 in New South Wales LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: A15 in New South Wales | Statement: [New England Highway, followsRouteNumber, A15 in New South Wales]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followsRouteNumber
Context triple: [New England Highway, followsRouteNumber, A15 in New South Wales]
  • A. followsRouteOf
    Indicates that one entity travels along the same path or route that another entity takes or has taken.
  • B. routeNumber chosen
    Indicates the specific identifying number assigned to a route within a transportation or delivery network.
  • C. formerRouteNumber
    Indicates that an entity previously had a specific route number before being renumbered, discontinued, or otherwise changed.
  • D. isNumberedRouteIn
    Indicates that a numbered route (such as a highway or road with an assigned number) is located within or passes through a specified geographic or administrative area.
  • E. routeNumberFormat
    Indicates how the identifying number or code for a route is structured or formatted.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a7f80c8190a05e43013f298942 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb2e5fc6c81909ff582611751096d completed March 8, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada433059881908e46f38cc5f40a32 completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:13 p.m.