Triple

T33734699
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Law Library (University at Buffalo) E864379 entity
Predicate hasMaterialFormat P1845 FINISHED
Object print resources LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: print resources | Statement: [Law Library (University at Buffalo), hasMaterialFormat, print resources]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMaterialFormat
Context triple: [Law Library (University at Buffalo), hasMaterialFormat, print resources]
  • A. hasMaterialFormOnSet
    Indicates that something possesses a tangible, physical form or embodiment during the production or staging of a set.
  • B. hasMaterialType chosen
    Indicates that something is composed of, made from, or characterized by a specific type of material.
  • C. hasFileFormat
    Indicates that one entity (typically a digital file or resource) is encoded, stored, or represented using a specific file format defined by the other entity.
  • D. hasWorkingFormat
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a functional or operational format of another entity.
  • E. hasProductionFormat
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or presented in, a particular production or media format.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498a64cc8190b4b414c67b280d93 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a01378bf05c8190af9f5e06a2810c7d completed May 11, 2026, 1:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0137277c6c8190bcec341f2a0757c4 completed May 11, 2026, 1:55 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:44 a.m.