Triple

T33728903
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Curtain: Poirot's Last Case E864219 entity
Predicate featuresFictionalMurdererType P203815 FINISHED
Object serial killer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: serial killer | Statement: [Curtain: Poirot's Last Case, featuresFictionalMurdererType, serial killer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresFictionalMurdererType
Context triple: [Curtain: Poirot's Last Case, featuresFictionalMurdererType, serial killer]
  • A. fictionalKillerName
    Indicates that an entity is known by a particular fictional name as a killer or murderer.
  • B. hasSerialKiller
    Indicates that one entity is a serial killer associated with, responsible for, or targeting another entity.
  • C. fictionalAuthorVictim
    Indicates that one entity is the author of a fictional work in which the other entity appears as a victim.
  • D. hasFictionalDetective
    Indicates that one entity (typically a work or series) features or includes a fictional detective character as part of its content.
  • E. featuresFictionalCourtCase
    Indicates that something includes or presents a court case that is fictional rather than real.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498a64cc8190b4b414c67b280d93 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a020ec13d808190b41acdc31adc4191 completed May 11, 2026, 5:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a020d9259c08190ad0370091c23ea8a completed May 11, 2026, 5:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a020ec02db481908ba6487e19c02491 completed May 11, 2026, 5:15 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:44 a.m.