Triple
T33715487
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rich Gang: Tapout |
E863855
|
entity |
| Predicate | belongsToMusicCollective |
P40587
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rich Gang |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rich Gang | Statement: [Rich Gang: Tapout, belongsToMusicCollective, Rich Gang]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: belongsToMusicCollective Context triple: [Rich Gang: Tapout, belongsToMusicCollective, Rich Gang]
-
A.
belongsToArtist
Indicates that something is owned, created, or otherwise associated with a specific artist.
-
B.
musicGroupFormedPartOf
Indicates that one musical group was formed as a component, subdivision, or offshoot of another musical group.
-
C.
associatedWithArtistGroup
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a relationship or connection with a particular artist group or collective.
-
D.
musicalAssociation
Indicates a relationship where entities are connected through music, such as collaboration, influence, shared performance, or other musically relevant association.
-
E.
partnerInMusicGroupWith
Indicates that two entities are members of the same music group or band, sharing a collaborative musical partnership.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34989871c81908682e22a2fe4b829 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff29d831b881908d485609e0fc1d0b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff28f9f9e4819087f3402735de66c7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:30 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:44 a.m.