Triple

T33687821
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 4th Battalion E863088 entity
Predicate hasHistoricSubunit P8012 FINISHED
Object Commander-in-Chief’s Guard NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Commander-in-Chief’s Guard | Statement: [4th Battalion, hasHistoricSubunit, Commander-in-Chief’s Guard]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricSubunit
Context triple: [4th Battalion, hasHistoricSubunit, Commander-in-Chief’s Guard]
  • A. historicalSubunit
    Indicates that one entity functioned as a subordinate or component part of another entity during a specific historical period, but is no longer in that role in the present.
  • B. historicalSubunitToUnit chosen
    Indicates that one entity was historically a subunit, subdivision, or component of another larger entity.
  • C. hasSubhistory
    Indicates that one history or sequence of events is a component, segment, or nested part of another, larger history.
  • D. hasHistoricalCountrySubdivision
    Indicates that one entity was a territorial or administrative subdivision of a historical country.
  • E. hasHistoricalSubstratum
    Indicates that one entity is historically underlain or influenced by another, earlier cultural, linguistic, or structural layer.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498662b48190904442c39df84fb7 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fedec693b08190b0f8bfdb921e0766 completed May 9, 2026, 7:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fede16c1d48190a20d8a9c5722c307 completed May 9, 2026, 7:11 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:43 a.m.