Triple

T33639673
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Collard Greens E861796 entity
Predicate hasUpbeatProduction P177456 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Collard Greens, hasUpbeatProduction, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUpbeatProduction
Context triple: [Collard Greens, hasUpbeatProduction, yes]
  • A. hasMelodicProduction
    Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) features a production style characterized by prominent, structured melodies.
  • B. hasBassHeavyProduction
    Indicates that the music’s production emphasizes low-frequency sounds, giving it a strong, prominent bass presence.
  • C. hasSoulfulProduction
    Indicates that something (typically a piece of music) features production characterized by emotional depth, warmth, and stylistic elements associated with soul music.
  • D. hasElectronicBeat
    Indicates that the associated music or audio features a rhythm or backing track produced using electronic instruments or digital sound processing.
  • E. hasSynthProduction
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or involved in the production of synthesized (synthetic) material, content, or output.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498280c48190bcc3494017d14234 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6fb93224881908fc66fe76115fcdb completed May 3, 2026, 7:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f96badb08190994442c2aba840b1 completed May 3, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6fb17d5ec81909091e37e1ddbe577 completed May 3, 2026, 7:36 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:42 a.m.