Triple

T33629862
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Seiberg–Witten invariants E861521 entity
Predicate wellDefinedWhen P176977 FINISHED
Object b2^+ > 1 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: b2^+ > 1 | Statement: [Seiberg–Witten invariants, wellDefinedWhen, b2^+ > 1]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wellDefinedWhen
Context triple: [Seiberg–Witten invariants, wellDefinedWhen, b2^+ > 1]
  • A. wellPosedness
    Indicates that a problem or system satisfies the conditions (such as existence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions) required to be considered mathematically well-posed.
  • B. definedOn
    Indicates that something (such as a function, rule, or structure) is specified to apply or be valid over a particular domain, set, or context.
  • C. wasDefinedBy
    Indicates that something was formally specified, described, or established by a particular agent, source, or defining entity.
  • D. defined
    Indicates that one entity specifies, explains, or establishes the meaning, scope, or identity of another entity.
  • E. areDefinedIn
    Indicates that the referenced entities are specified, described, or formally established within a particular source, context, or scope.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34981c54c81909b33c3fa2208a52d completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6f85ad54881909afc34657322f20a completed May 3, 2026, 7:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f6632dfc8190af85e258c8519207 completed May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6f70b0ca081908b24a98937e6ef66 completed May 3, 2026, 7:19 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.