Triple
T336214
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act |
E6731
|
entity |
| Predicate | Cutter v. WilkinsonHolding |
P1123
|
FINISHED |
| Object | upheld constitutionality of institutionalized persons provisions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: upheld constitutionality of institutionalized persons provisions | Statement: [Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, Cutter v. WilkinsonHolding, upheld constitutionality of institutionalized persons provisions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Cutter v. WilkinsonHolding Context triple: [Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, Cutter v. WilkinsonHolding, upheld constitutionality of institutionalized persons provisions]
-
A.
upheldBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
-
B.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
-
C.
concurringJustice
Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
-
D.
heldThat
Indicates that an entity (often a person or authority) maintained, asserted, or concluded that a particular proposition or judgment is true.
-
E.
rightHolder
Indicates that one entity holds or possesses a legal or contractual right in relation to another entity or resource.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79434908190a9d5afe415153ad9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eac950388190829875a07d821ddf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e94f049881908f10bb6548a8bb2e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.