Triple
T336194
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act |
E6731
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStandard |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | compelling governmental interest |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: compelling governmental interest | Statement: [Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, legalStandard, compelling governmental interest]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStandard Context triple: [Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, legalStandard, compelling governmental interest]
-
A.
legalStandardHistoricallyAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal standard has been historically linked or traditionally associated with another legal concept, practice, or context.
-
B.
legalRequirement
Indicates that one entity is obligated by law to perform, provide, or comply with something in relation to another entity or situation.
-
C.
legalAct
Indicates that an entity performs, enacts, or is involved in a formal legal action, measure, or proceeding under a legal framework.
-
D.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
E.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79434908190a9d5afe415153ad9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eac950388190829875a07d821ddf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e94f049881908f10bb6548a8bb2e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.