Triple
T33593145
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yvonne Carmichael |
E860482
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalProcessExperienced |
P3010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Crown Court trial |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crown Court trial | Statement: [Yvonne Carmichael, legalProcessExperienced, Crown Court trial]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalProcessExperienced Context triple: [Yvonne Carmichael, legalProcessExperienced, Crown Court trial]
-
A.
relatedLegalProcess
Indicates that there is an associated legal proceeding or action that is connected to, arises from, or is otherwise relevant to the referenced entity or event.
-
B.
legalProcedureUsed
Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
-
C.
hasLegalProceeding
chosen
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
D.
legalActionFiled
Indicates that a formal legal proceeding or complaint has been officially initiated with the appropriate authority or court.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497e70e48190951c94d072879bec |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff289541e0819096eeceb8e6332650 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff281ab1988190920f0443be9f10cc |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.