Triple

T33575629
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A minor E860021 entity
Predicate usedInWesternTonalMusic P196916 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [A minor, usedInWesternTonalMusic, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInWesternTonalMusic
Context triple: [A minor, usedInWesternTonalMusic, true]
  • A. tonalSystem
    Indicates a relationship where a language or musical system is characterized by a specific set of tonal patterns or pitch distinctions that structure its sounds or expressions.
  • B. tonal
    Indicates that one entity has a tone, pitch pattern, or tonal quality in relation to another (such as a language, sound, or musical element).
  • C. tonalFeatures
    Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes the tonal properties or qualities associated with another entity.
  • D. tonalArchitecture
    Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, shapes, or organizes the tonal structure or harmonic framework of another (such as a piece, passage, or system).
  • E. tonalDescription
    Indicates the relationship in which one entity characterizes or specifies the tonal qualities or sound-related attributes of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497d37848190afcbb5ef3f5c7376 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe6e492bf8819080b25221d13445ea completed May 8, 2026, 11:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe6dd33a6881908fe9bbbc184cab51 completed May 8, 2026, 11:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe6e4801108190a6be6bec2d52a1b9 completed May 8, 2026, 11:14 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.