Triple
T33575618
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A minor |
E860021
|
entity |
| Predicate | leadingToneInHarmonicMinor |
P178655
|
FINISHED |
| Object | G♯ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: G♯ | Statement: [A minor, leadingToneInHarmonicMinor, G♯]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: leadingToneInHarmonicMinor Context triple: [A minor, leadingToneInHarmonicMinor, G♯]
-
A.
leadingToneTriad
Indicates a triad built on the leading tone (the seventh scale degree) that functions to resolve toward the tonic harmony.
-
B.
naturalMinorScale
Indicates that one musical entity is related to another as a natural minor scale built from its tonic, following the specific interval pattern of that scale.
-
C.
hasHarmonicMinorVariant
Indicates that one musical element (such as a scale, key, or melody) has a corresponding form that is derived from or expressed in the harmonic minor variant.
-
D.
dominantNote
Indicates that one note functions as the dominant (fifth scale degree) in relation to another note, typically resolving to it harmonically.
-
E.
dominantTone
Indicates the primary or most prominent emotional or stylistic tone that characterizes something in relation to other possible tones.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497d37848190afcbb5ef3f5c7376 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f713bfdc148190a249a7874320bab8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7127884388190884f23d181a65d19 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7135fa2988190a20a94cfe616d754 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.