Triple
T33575241
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | When You Danced with Me |
E860011
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasComebackAlbum |
P115543
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Voyage |
E244930
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Voyage | Statement: [When You Danced with Me, hasComebackAlbum, Voyage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasComebackAlbum Context triple: [When You Danced with Me, hasComebackAlbum, Voyage]
-
A.
isOnComebackAlbum
chosen
Indicates that an entity (such as a song or track) appears on an album that marks a return or resurgence for the artist after a period of reduced activity or absence.
-
B.
comebackAlbumFor
Indicates that one album serves as an artist’s return or resurgence release following a period of inactivity, decline, or absence.
-
C.
hasReRecordedReleaseAlbum
Indicates that an album has a subsequent release that is a re-recorded version of the original album.
-
D.
madeComeback
Indicates that an entity returned to a previous level of success, performance, or prominence after a period of decline, absence, or setback.
-
E.
hasAlbumRelease
Indicates that an entity (typically an artist or band) has released a specific music album.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497d37848190afcbb5ef3f5c7376 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8ae0248190b7e2ce4bf852c22d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a3665638c9c8190bdc3bd12dbc35115 |
completed | June 20, 2026, 10:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f505c88190ac0879ab422c3054 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.