Triple
T33567482
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing |
E859795
|
entity |
| Predicate | citesFramework |
P11063
|
FINISHED |
| Object | problem-solving theory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: problem-solving theory | Statement: [A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing, citesFramework, problem-solving theory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citesFramework Context triple: [A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing, citesFramework, problem-solving theory]
-
A.
citationSystem
Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies or uses a particular system, style, or standard for formatting and managing citations.
-
B.
citesAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity references or acknowledges another as a source of information, authority, or evidence.
-
C.
legalCitationSystem
Indicates a system or convention used to reference and identify legal authorities such as cases, statutes, or regulations.
-
D.
citesBody
Indicates that one entity references or cites the content, findings, or text of another entity as a source.
-
E.
citationRecognizedBy
Indicates that a citation has been acknowledged, accepted, or formally recognized by a particular entity or authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497c1d288190a844ea699914e038 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f740ee548190a73daee3321d8264 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f6632dfc8190af85e258c8519207 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.