Triple
T33556935
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Philip Miller |
E859501
|
entity |
| Predicate | creativeSearchFocus |
P199111
|
FINISHED |
| Object | collective memory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: collective memory | Statement: [Philip Miller, creativeSearchFocus, collective memory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: creativeSearchFocus Context triple: [Philip Miller, creativeSearchFocus, collective memory]
-
A.
creativeSearch
Indicates that an entity performs or engages in a search process that involves creativity, exploration, or the generation of novel ideas or solutions.
-
B.
creativeWorkFocus
Indicates that one entity is the primary subject, theme, or focal point of another entity’s creative work.
-
C.
categoryFocus
Indicates that one entity is the primary subject, theme, or focal point within the broader category defined by the other entity.
-
D.
creativeDirectionBy
Indicates that the creative direction or overall artistic vision for something is provided or led by a specified entity.
-
E.
hasCreativeSearch
Indicates a relationship where an entity employs or is associated with a search process or functionality that involves creativity, innovation, or generative exploration beyond standard search methods.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497b2b68819093207971b5e13dc8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff1f3f94fc819095955299f50ab4ce |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff1ea47748819082f63d9b9d9c3e65 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:46 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff1f3ee3588190a857d1504c93be8b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:49 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.