Triple

T33550498
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frida E859317 entity
Predicate hasArtistLaterKnownFor P194914 FINISHED
Object membership in ABBA LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: membership in ABBA | Statement: [Frida, hasArtistLaterKnownFor, membership in ABBA]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArtistLaterKnownFor
Context triple: [Frida, hasArtistLaterKnownFor, membership in ABBA]
  • A. recordingArtistLaterKnownAs
    Indicates that the subject is a recording artist who was later known by the name or identity represented by the object.
  • B. mainArtistLaterCameOutAs
    Indicates that the primary artist associated with something was later publicly revealed or self-identified as a particular sexual orientation or gender identity.
  • C. recordingArtistPreviouslyKnownAs
    Indicates that the recording artist currently known by one name was formerly known and credited under a different name.
  • D. hasArtistCurrentName
    Indicates that the specified name is the artist’s current, officially used name.
  • E. notableFormerArtist
    Indicates that the subject was previously an artist associated with the object and is recognized as notable in that former artistic role.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497b2b68819093207971b5e13dc8 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd8e5f7c4c8190ab8e2f2a7bb1bd79 completed May 8, 2026, 7:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8d8a16f08190b9e880901bfa44fe completed May 8, 2026, 7:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd8e5e9ca48190890a2caddc1f9f5c completed May 8, 2026, 7:18 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:39 a.m.